Jim on Marriage

Since I am mining Jim’s Blog for good material — which everyone should do — here are his thoughts from 2019 on Marriage.

Like him, I conclude that we will need to form a new “Home and Family Tribe,” which will largely take the form of religion. There is no particular need for a new religion here, and, as Jim shows, Christianity actually works quite well. Indeed, Jim argues that Christianity spread in the late Roman world precisely because it served as a Home and Family Tribe in the midst of a breakdown of Roman society, much like our own.

Marriage

The core of the reactionary program is to make marriage legal again. Without marriage, the higher races cannot reproduce successfully, and reproduction is dysgenic.

Leftist marriage, modern marriage, is gay. Marriage has been gay since 1928.

Obviously reactionaries must reintroduce marriage that is suitable for heterogamous organisms, and we will have to introduce it as a matter of faith and morals before we can introduce it as a matter of law.

The left offers your wife cash and prizes for destroying the family assets, destroying you and destroying your children. The lawyer and the marriage counselor will tell her she is oppressed, and she can get a court order that gives her cash and prizes, raises her status, and will result in her marrying a six foot six billionaire athlete with a dong the size of a salami.

Modern marriage is gay. Everyone who gets married gets gay married. If your wedding vows are symmetric and interchangeable, the same of the man as for the woman, your marriage is gay and you are being gay married.

If your wedding has a master of ceremonies or a priest who acts like he, rather than the groom, is the big important man at the wedding, that he is the alpha male, your wedding is gay, and you are being gay married. (And the master of ceremonies is usually gay, and if he is not gay, he thinks that two males pretending to marry each other with the intention of cruising for nine year old boys to transexualize is smart and fashionable.)

The wedding organizer appoints a gay master of ceremonies whose main job is to define the groom as Homer Simpson, to emasculate him in the eyes of the bride. The minister conducts a gay wedding ceremony that treats the bride and groom as equal and interchangeable, even though experience has demonstrated that wives will not tolerate househusbands, and will invariably leave a domesticated man for a wild man who beats her, rapes her, and rapes and beats her husband’s children.

…

I agree that, at a wedding, the Husband should be the master of the show, followed by the bride’s Father — not the Church, or State. If the Church or State is the Chief, then basically the man is signing himself into slavery, enforced by the Church and State. And what woman can respect that?

Also, we should make sure that our best women, from the best families, the high IQ girls, the best looking girls, the girls with the best character, behavior and morals — should reproduce in large numbers.