Welcome to my blog. Its purpose is to explore various topics regarding sex, marriage and family — an area with many problems today, as has been amply explored by the “red pill community.” They have done an excellent job of analysis and description. But, little has been said about solutions, and this persistent lack has been troubling me, so I will take it up. I tried doing a little bit via YouTube, the preferred medium these days it seems, but I am not suited to it. So, I will join with Dalrock, Rollo Tomassi and others in print. Like Dalrock, I am happily married, for seventeen years, and have a son. (Yes, it really is “happily,” perhaps because my wife is Japanese, and her English even now is bad enough that she is isolated from Western media and the society of Western women.) Perhaps I would like to have my son, when he is older, to have some kind of woman available besides wasted harlots.
In general, I am a Traditionalist. This is different than today’s TradCons, which Dalrock (among many) have rightly eviscerated. But one thing you can say about Traditional solutions is that they have actually worked, in real life, for a long period of time, and produced good results. You could invent some kind of new solution, but Utopian dreams sometimes don’t work out. I am not a Christian, although I find that they are my natural allies, so I am Christian-friendly. Ezra Pound once did a broad review of spiritual traditions, including many in the East. He eventually decided to become a Christian (specifically, an Anglican), not because he was not aware of the many failings of the Anglican Church in his day, but because he realized that, if he wanted to gain the advantages that come from cooperation with like-minded people, he would have to join some kind of existing community.
I say often that “you have to tell women what to do.” They seem to be incapable of organizing their actions without external leadership. This leadership may come in the form of individual vision, or it may come in the form of social norms, in-group behavior, and the artificially-created “social norms” and “in-group behavior” manufactured by the Cultural Marxists in music, television and movies. Women have a choice of which leadership they choose. But, they seem to lack the masculine capability of analysis and description, awareness of longer-term cause and effect, and also based on this, invention of definite solutions, independent of existing norms. Without someone else to do these things, who they can follow, they are rudderless. Some women are quite intelligent, but this ability is usually channeled entirely toward the Rationalization Hamster, and also lies, manipulation, and deceit. (This is basically the Rationalization Hamster applied to others.) But along with this, women are open to suggestion. If some men start telling women what to do, and it seems to them an attractive proposition, some women will follow.
And so, although you can lament the present condition of women in the U.S. and the West today, unless you tell them what to do, they will not change. It is not enough to say “I don’t like this and I don’t like that.” Eliminating options and identifying problems are important steps toward figuring out What To Do, but do not create a solution in themselves. Along with this, men have to clarify what they want. Today, we lament the fact that most women today are unfit to be wives and mothers, and are frankly dangerous and destructive in those roles. And yet, we seem to like having a large supply of sluts on ready call, so we have been perhaps a little hesitant to say: don’t be sluts. Obviously, we are going to have to make some decisions here. Are you ready for a world in which women are sexually unavailable until after your wedding day?
Unfortunately, by focusing on analysis and description of present conditions, men are, in a way, telling women what to do. Men say that “all women are like that.” Women hear this, and, following what they are being told by men, as is their nature, behave in the manner that such men say they behave. While it is true that women certainly have the potential to be “like that,” and today that potential is reality, it is also true that, in the past, they were not like that. Just as there is “women’s nature,” there is also “men’s nature.” For example, men have the potential for domination and plunder, that we see in every gang or group of bandits, and which anthropologists have recorded in primitive human societies around the world. And yet, most men today are not like that. The difference is part of what we call: civilization.
Thus, I want to focus on concrete, specific solutions. For example, there is near-universal agreement that today’s laws regarding divorce, sexual assault, domestic violence and other interactions between men and women are grossly anti-male and dysfunctional today. But, you rarely hear anyone say what, then, the laws should be. If you were to change it, what would you do? In the past (before 1970), for example, divorce required either mutual consent and terms acceptable to both parties, or, for a unilateral divorce, abridgement of certain conditions, notably adultery or serious domestic violence, with evidence that would hold up in jury trial. In another example from history, divorce among the ancient Romans would result in the man keeping the children. This served as a double preventative: most women would avoid divorce if it meant being separated from her children; and also, a man looking for a younger, sexier wife would probably be handicapped by having custody of his children. This would naturally require someone to handle childcare; and what better (or cheaper) person than the children’s natural mother? At the same time, a younger, sexier women would probably not be very interested in caring for another woman’s offspring.
Besides not telling women what to do, men today are bizarrely, pathologically politically inactive. Men need to join together and get things done to change the laws, just as men have always done to produce any change. Look around you: who is going to do it, if not men? At the very least, men should support existing men’s rights organizations. It is true that they have been woefully ineffective. But, more money would probably help fix that. Any man who is unwilling to give $25 to an existing MRA organization deserves everything he gets. This is evidence of extreme learned helplessness. Think of it like doing political pushups. If you can’t do even one pushup, you are in bad shape my friend. Get over your learned helplessness. Give another $25 to the YouTube Redpill personality of your choice. Divorce law is State law, so eventually there will have to be an MRA organization for each state, which lobbies and informs State legislators: the Ohio Society for Men’s Rights. If all concerned men were giving $100 a year in total to the cause, there would be enough money around that other men would have the funding to establish such organizations. Unfortunately, most men cannot risk too much opprobrium, as it jeopardizes their livelihoods. Thus, we need specialists, whose livelihood is itself based on objecting to the status quo, and who can serve as professional lightning rods.
Men are the builders of civilization, not only in steel and concrete, but also in laws and principles. Women nurture the creations of the men of their choice. So: start building.
The Girls Are Not OK
As our state religion goes lefter and lefter, indoctrination in the schools has become ever more extreme, intense and deranged.
The boys are rebelling against maniacal hatred, demonization, and systematic heavy handed discrimination against males, but the girls are sucking it up.
And in consequence, going every more evil and insane, ever more sad, crazy, and depressed. And every less likely to have sex, let alone love and romance, and most of all, ever less likely to ever have children.
The red pill is an effort to teach men to understand women. But today’s women understand themselves even less.
At puberty, girls experience a sudden and extraordinary shock. They become sexually desirable and desired. This is genuinely terrifying, and they have no idea how to handle it, how to respond, and tend to respond in ways that become every crazier and self destructive.
One day, a girl wakes up and she is a sex object. This is terrifying. Men want her and they are bigger than her and stronger than her.
Of course women want to be desired, and they especially want to be desired by scary dangerous men. They want to be scared. But they don’t understand that they want this. They think that they very much want to not be scared. And they are very vigorously taught that it is bad, wicked and oppressive, that men are scaring them. It is not easy for a woman to understand that she desires to be frighteningly desired, and it is a great deal harder for her to understand this when she is being taught that this is horrible patriarchal oppression. That she does not want it, and in fact hates, what she wants. And there is considerable truth in the story that she is being brainwashed with — she truly does not want it, she truly does hate it. But also she does truly want it and she loves what she hates.
Used to be there were social rules, customs to handle this, and women were firmly steered towards paths for dealing with it. Now, however, all that cultural knowledge has been systematically destroyed, and those customs effectively criminalised.
So girls are now lost, in a storm of powerful forces within them and outside them.
Girls should not be in coed education when they suddenly and shockingly start to get hot. They are not mentally equipped to handle it — not at any age, but even less at that age.
Just as the cafeteria diet, the 24/7 availability of tasty snacks, makes them morbidly obese, the ready availability of the dreaded and desired male gaze makes them whores, resulting in hoeflation.
Within the official Sex-Positivity doctrine, the constraints that steered girls towards appropriate relationships with men are seen as old-fashioned and oppressive. So she is likely to become a social media whore — posting sexy pictures for attention — but somehow all that attention is unlikely to lead to a relationship, other than number twenty on mister one in thirty’s booty call list, which renders all that attention rather less satisfactory than it seemed at first.
The relentless and coercive Sex-Positivity of the education system for girls is not actually sex positive at all, for it amounts to a forceful demand that girls act like sodomites, which, the sexual nature of women being very different, is not only anti love and anti reproduction, is also, for women, anti sex. Gay Sex-Positivity results in schoolgirls having sex with lots of different men, but nonetheless having very little sex.
Love is war, love is a battlefield. All is fair in love and war.
Now it is all war, and there is no love. Sex-Positivity winds up as a social media performance, conducted purely digitally.
Men suffer hoeflation, women find that performing sexiness merely degrades them. Gender dysphoria is one of many self destructive female responses to the male gaze. Women hate themselves, because not only do they compare every man to Mister One in Thirty, they compare themselves to Miss One in a Hundred.
Mister One in Thirty, they discover, sees them as just a hole to relieve himself in. If they were like Miss One in a Hundred, they think, they would get way more of that much hated, and much wanted, male gaze, and Mister one in Thirty would love them.
Sexual norms today skirt around one obvious, horrifying fact: women like being sex objects. And they especially skirt around the most horrifying fact of them all — that women don’t actually like being sex objects for men that do not frighten them. They like being sex objects of scary dangerous frightening men. Today’s young women don’t know this, and dare not admit to it. And this is driving them insane.
Women are deranged, and the youngest women are the most severely deranged because no one is honest with them and they cannot be honest with themselves. If anyone speaks the truth to them, he is apt to be severely punished.
Women are not allowed to know that they desire to be desired and loved. Supposedly they should only desire a high powered career. And it is intolerably low status, horrible, and disgusting, for a woman to act in ways that are likely to result in her being not only desired, but also loved. That if they want to fall in love and want to be a mother, they are traitors to their sex, that they are collaborating in the oppression of women by that horrible male gaze. That it is not OK to be what girls inherently are. Reflect on the outrage and hostility directed against the homemaker Youtube genre.
They don’t know how act in ways likely to result in love and motherhood, so they act in weird and self destructive ways.
No Deal Available For Men and Women To Have A Life Together
Marriage 1.0 is now illegal, and there is no alternative with which to form a family that is legal and socially acceptable in polite company.
Love is war, love is a battlefield, all is fair in love and war.
Marriage 2.0 does not work. A ship must have one captain, and a household one captain, and if you have two captains you have two ships, which wind up passing in the night.
Young men view young women as icky and broken, and young women view young men as — well they just don’t see them at all, because almost all young males are lower status than almost any young woman, and women inherently find low status males invisible, and if they notice them at all, it is like noticing rats and cockroaches. They look around for the bug spray, they think that these icky people should be gassed. This is not just the long standing problem that the patriarchy has been fighting forever, that miss average wants to fuck mister one in thirty, this is the new and worse problem that when miss average is pushing thirty years old and thirty pounds overweight, only mister one in thirty is barely acceptable (and she thinks that all the rest should be eradicated. Observe the smugness of the Karen. She sees whatever man is in front of her, including her boss or a cop with a gun, as insignificant, irritating, unimportant, and disgusting vermin. OK, Taylor Swift married mister one in thirty at thirtysix, but most women are do not look like Taylor Swift, and still less do they look like Taylor Swift when they hit thirtysix.)
For men, it is much simpler. Most men don’t get pussy, and if they do the juice is not worth the squeeze. Does he want miss average thirty year old and thirty pounds overweight?
But wait. Some men, some social groups, and some nations are still successfully reproducing. Not many, but definitely some.
How do they do it? Well?
Surprise:
Faith
They do it by the power and authority of God.
If you look at population groups that do it, the key factor is that the girls during puberty are attending a school that teaches old type religion, in which God commands marriage 1.0, and lead the girl to expect that the strange feelings she is now getting, the itch she would rather like scratched, should addressed in that situation. Early puberty, around age eleven to thirteen or so, seems to be the critical formative period. Earlier and later religious education seems to have little effect, and religious education of the boys seems to have little effect.
I conjecture that at puberty girls form an idea of their sexual future, and if in school being taught a religion that specifies different roles for men and women, envisage themselves getting nailed as young wife and mother under the authority of a husband, rather than career girl getting all the sexual activity that television shows depict, but which in real life happens considerably less than advertised, and without the romance part — the career girl who is getting regularly nailed is getting nailed as number seven on mister one in thirty’s booty call list, and rather less frequently as number fourteen on mister one in sixty’s booty call list. And, due to abortion and contraception, motherhood does not ensue, or ensues only when her fertile window is on its last egg.
If you look at nations that do it, the state religion is not progressivism, nor a nominally deistic religion converged to “the arc of history”, it is an old type deistic religion. A religion whose priests do not condescend to the people of their holy books as their moral inferiors.
If you look at individual males that do it, the key factor is that under their roofs they are King and High Priest, they have rightful authority over their wives and children granted them by God.
The prescription for marriage 1.0 is right there in the bible, our manual and textbook for ancient social technologies proven by experience to work:
1 Corinthians 7
- Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
- The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
- Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
Ephesians 5:22
- Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
- For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
- Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
- Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
- That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
- That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
- So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
- For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
- For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
- For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
- This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
- Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.
First Corinthians 11
- For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
- Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
First Timothy 2
- Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
- But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
- For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
- And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
- Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
First Peter 3
- Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
- While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
- Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
- But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
- For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
- Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.
- Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.
- Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous:
- Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Since people these days are unfamiliar with the Bible, I need to clarify the reference to Sara. “Even as Sara obeyed Abraham”. Abraham commanded Sarah to do a very wicked thing. Peter tells us that wives should emulate Sara. It is not a wife’s job to “give her husband a wake up call” or to “fix her husband”. It is her job to obey.
The beginning of the catastrophe that now afflicts us was the Victorian elevation of the wife to the moral authority of the household. Any idiot can see that women are the weaker vessel, and are profoundly and inherently ill suited to be moral authorities.
If you look at female erotic fantasies, they are mostly rape fantasies, or rape fantasies rather thinly disguised as not-quite-rape fantasies.
There is a large genre of disturbingly violent and monstrous romance fantasies, “Dark Romance”, and it is precisely shitlib women, feminists, and karens who are most keen on these.
An example of taking this to disturbing lengths is “Cry, or Better Yet, Beg”: Slave girl. Cold sadistic owner, Stockholm syndrome. 
Which is starting to get a little bit on the weird wide — not the slavery, nor the cruelty, but the “cold” — the lack of anything resembling reproductive sex. I am totally in favor of choking and spanking, but this comic’s decorous G rated no-flesh-on-flesh-contact cruelty is weird and perverted. The brains of the Karens are falling of the rails. But it is still a whole lot closer to what is natural, human, normal for humans, and bears a closer resemblance to the ancestral environment of successful reproduction than marriage 2.0. Marriage 2.0 is definitely weird.
I conjecture that the disgusting, weird, and creepy no-flesh-on-flesh-contact cruelty may be a reaction to the thirstiness of the men the karens encountered when they were young and hot — so they read desire for physical contact as weakness, fear, and neediness. So the non contact cruelty of the main male character looks like preselection to them, and if the main male character and the main female character were to actually do it, this would look low status and needy to them. I conjecture that the unnaturally high status of women in our society has fried their brains, much as the twenty four seven availability of tasty snacks has destroyed their bodies.
law
Marriage 1.0, decribed above in quotes from the bible, is everywhere illegal and subject to strong disapproval. Which can be successfully ignored by someone with outlaw attitude and the plausible semblance of faith in the lord, but it is a serious problem and grave danger.
The problem is that without support from law and society, you are in a prisoner’s dilemma problem. The natural outcome is defect/defect, which is few people are reproducing, and those that are reproducing get started late, towards the end of a woman’s fertile window.
Reproduction requires cooperation. Cooperation requires enforcement, and the only deal that works is illegal.
All women resent and resist male authority, all women are like that, but all women, like all dogs, are frightened, uncomfortable, distressed, neurotic, and anxious without a master. If a dog or a woman feels they are the alpha male of the household, they are going to go crazy and destructive. All women are like that.
Most women today describe their mental health as poor or terrible, and most young women are in therapy. Surveys show, however, that conservative married women of faith are generally happy and seldom report mental problems, while young single liberal women, and most young women are liberal, and most liberal young women are single, report the poorest mental health, and the most sadness, anger, and bitterness.
All women want a man in their life who will impose guard rails that will protect them from themselves, and most women will insist on those guard rails being ultimately backed by force. They will give you a shit test that can only be passed by smacking them. It will not happen often, because they really do not like being smacked, or being coerced in such a direct and forceful fashion, but it will happen at least once, and usually a few times. After you have passed that one one or two times, you will usually not be retested, for the test is apt to be unpleasant for both of you. They don’t like to be smacked, but they very much like that they could be smacked. Sometimes the test gets to be a bedtime regular, but that does not seem to be the majority of women. It is nonetheless a whole lot of women. And after the umpteenth time, becomes far less fun than you might imagine. Gets old mighty fast.
All women want a husband’s authority, all women are like that. And they all want their husband’s authority to be supported by other men. And they usually do not get that in our society, because illegal and because of fake social consensus against it.
Suppose Ann wants to do X, and her husband says “No X”. All the women in her life are going to say “You go girl, you do X”. But if Carol says to Ann “Your husband spoke to my husband, and my husband said no X”, this has vastly greater impact than any number of women saying X. All women are like that.
Women resent and resist male authority. All women are like that. But women very much want to be securely embedded in a social environment of coercive male authority and if not so embedded, will do their best to become embedded. The typical shitlib feminist Karen is reading romances that go something like this. The main female character is a socially isolated shitlib living in the modern world, then gets soul transmigrated, magically transported, or something even more improbable, into a world where she no longer is socially isolated, but is embedded in strong social patriarchal constraints. Then she gets sold into a rich man’s harem, or something like that, and on the way to meet her husband her coach is attacked by a monster, who destroys the coach, kills everyone except her, or something like that, then abducts her to his lair, where it turns out he is a were monster or were beast and his other form is a handsome prince, or something like that, and then it turns out that he is the top alpha male in his home base, and is surrounded by other alpha males who more or less accept his alpha male authority.
In another variant of the were creature trope, instead of the were form of the main male character being a powerful dangerous creature who can turn at will into a handsome prince, the were form of the main female character is a small helpless creature who cannot turn at will into her human form, and in her were form is apt to be killed on sight if she does not freeze or starve first, unless she becomes a pet or domestic animal, and is thus freed from her inconvenient human rights which get in the way of the sexual relationship that the readers would obviously prefer. (She winds up having human form in her owners bedroom around bedtime.)
The soul transmigration/magical transportation trope tells us what these shitlib feminist women actually want, male authority embedded in broader social authority of males, which the laws that they lobbied for have taken from them, taken from all women, taken from all women and all men — the ancestral environment of successful reproduction. Everyone always longs for the ancestral environment, which why we create a simulation of the savanna biome everywhere we go.
What Women Want
Posting recently about Save-A-Ho Maxxing has left me with such a bad taste in my mouth, that I am inspired to post here verbatim some recent items from Jim at Jim’s Blog. I think this is especially helpful for young men. After being married for over twenty years, I don’t disagree with his assessment.
Women want what they do not want, and love what they hate.
Men understand what they want in love, sex, and romance, and act to attain it in a way that seems to them realistically likely to attain it. There is a straightforward connection between desire, intent, and action.
Women are not like that, and consent culture has imposed upon them an insoluble task to which they were not exposed to in the ancestral environment of evolutionary adaptation. They face a problem that lacks a rational solution, and their response to it is, unsurprisingly, deeply irrational.
Miss Average wants to be loved and cared for my mister one in thirty, by the six foot six billionaire athlete vampire King, and proceeds to act in ways that make it unlikely that anyone will ever love her except her cats, that no one will ever care for her, and that she will die alone and be eaten by her cats.
Some of them panic at age thirty or forty, and proceed to condescend to reluctantly marry mister average, who is fifty years old and involuntarily celibate up till now, but by that time, her eggs and her womb have probably dried up.
And when parents and uncles tell their rapidly ageing daughters and nieces that they should get their act together, it is totally and completely ineffective. They get really really angry on being advised.
Women complain men are not willing to commit, not even willing to approach. Meaning mister one in thirty is not willing to commit to miss average, and mister average is not going to approach miss average, because he will probably be charged with sexual harassment, rape and assault. Women just do not like low status males around, any more than they want rats and cockroaches around.
Obviously women are happiest staying at home cooking, cleaning, serving and obeying their husband. But, in the event that the six foot six billionaire vampire King should fall madly in love with her, have absolutely no intention of cooking, cleaning, serving, and obeying him. They will, off the bat, make entirely unreasonable demands.
Of course these demands are merely a shit test, what they actually hope for is to be smacked and handed a mop. But they are unaware of hoping for this.
Of course we all know that in matters of love and sex, what females intend, and what they believe that they want, have little connection to actual female conduct. “It just happened”. It is all a shit test. But this shit test is preventing successful family formation and reproduction.
There are a number of obstacles to reproduction.
1. Defect/Defect equilibrium. It is in both party’s interest to defect on their partner before they get defected on. It is a woman’s reproductive interest to be in a situation where she cannot defect, thus human females reproduce most successfully as property, men least successfully as property. Notice the tendency of female romances to be set in magical worlds where the main female character is excused from the inconvenience of consent. We all, male and female, long for the ancestral environment of successful reproduction.
2. Women have an absurdly inflated idea of the their value as a wife or a long term partner, because it is easy for them to get semen from a high value man.
3. Women have absurdly inflated idea of their value as a relationship partner, because they delude themselves that they are in a relationship, when they are merely somewhere near the bottom of a long booty call list.
4. Even if a woman has an accurate idea of her value as a relationship partner, it is still female nature to avoid being with low value men, meaning men of value similar to herself, and try to be with high value men. If a women does this, despite having an accurate idea of her value as a relationship partner, then she is a filthy trash slut, as women tend to be unless forcefully restrained by a man with a stick, and since she does not want to think of herself as a filthy trash slut, she cultivates an inflated view of her own value to protect herself from the knowledge that she is a filthy trash slut.
5. Women don’t think they have to bring anything to a relationship except themselves, because they don’t have to bring anything to a booty call except themselves. If they hope to be loved, cared for, and looked after, they need to start by cleaning the man’s house, picking up his clothes, doing the laundry, and cooking a nice meal. Of course a chick is, in practice, never going to do that on her own initiative, because she subconsciously hopes to be made to do that. But because we men tend to be oblivious, we tend not to command until the amount of trash on the floor makes it difficult to move around, we have no clothes left that do not stink, and strange fungi are growing on the unwashed dishes. If a man is looking for a relationship, he needs to command service. If a woman is looking for a relationship, not much she can do except inject herself into situations where service is likely to be commanded, or else somehow overcome the natural female propensity to shit test by cooking, cleaning, and tidying up on her own initiative. There have been a few occasions, not often, where women have just shown up on my doorstep and just got on with sex, cooking, cleaning, and tidying up. Worked on me because I am just lazy and most men are just lazy. But it is much more in accordance with female nature and the mating dance for the man to drag her to his lair and put her to work, and women much prefer this to having to arrive under their own power. In the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, being dragged to the man’s lair and compelled to serve looks a lot more like permanent security suitable for raising children than just showing up under her own power. If the man dragged her there, he probably will not let her go.
Save-A-Ho Maxxing: Maximum Max Edition
Here’s a guy who, if he wasn’t a Christian, would probably be one of those guys that women just spread their legs for. He wouldn’t need any “game” at all. He would just assume that’s what women do.
In short, he could have any woman he wanted; so, why not have his female equivalent, a Christian girl who, if she weren’t a “waiting until marriage girl,” and making TikTok’s about “fleeing lust,” would spend her summer on some Rich Guy’s yacht?
Then, in the male virgin category, we have this guy, who would otherwise be Tinder World Champion.
“Zero female interaction.” WTF is this.
If he ends up marrying some Ho, I’m going to have to go over there and slap him myself.
Save-A-Ho Maxxing
Let me tell you how to spell “Captain Save-A-Ho” so you can have it tattooed on your forehead.
Our online Christians say this is pretty common. Many Churches today are basically telling young men to Go Save That Ho. This is because there are a lot of Hos in the pews.
For all time, many “fallen” women would end up in the Church in their 30s.
But, you didn’t marry them. They became nuns!
Meanwhile, there are many, many very fine women, Christian and otherwise, who are actually Waiting Until Marriage girls. There is no shortage of very fine young women, who are 22-ish Virgins, that these Christian men should marry.
Not a Ho!
As we can see, if you marry a Ho (body count 16+), the odds are against you. Yes, any one single woman might Beat The Odds. But, the chances are, she won’t; you just think she will, but you are wrong.
So now, as an alternative to the Save-A-Ho Maxxing going on in churches, let’s look at all the lovely Waiting For Marriage girls, and all you have to do is send them a DM on TikTok.
Baaaaabe.
But, there can be a little too much “fleeing from lust.” The object of “Purity Culture” is not maintaining “purity” indefinitely, it is to Get Married Young (first) and then Get Pounded Out on the Regular.
But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. (1 Corinthians 7-9)
Lastly, let’s catch up again with this girl, who was 30 years old and STILL waiting for marriage, while some doofuses are out there playing Captain Save-A-Ho.
It turns out this girl is a serious babe.
So just grab one of those girls, and don’t dilly dally about it. Get married in six months, or don’t. Because, how long do you want to be “waiting until marriage”?
Paulina Porizkova Takes On the Final Boss
Paulina Porizkova, former supermodel of the 1980s, and who has decided to test the limits of human ability to retain a sort of physical beauty with age, with all the world watching, is now facing the Final Boss: her Sixties.
Paulina has been playing on Expert Mode for a while now. No plastic surgery. No makeup. Not even hair coloring. And no filters.
Here she is at Age 58:
Now, Age 60+, she is on super-expert-mode.
Marriage > College
Here we will celebrate those girls who decided that they would rather get married than go to college.
This is the way. Live at home with your father until you are married.
Wait until marriage.
Get married young — ideally, 18-22, more broadly, 16-25.
Basically, like a Jane Austen heroine.
But, these girls will have to actually get married. They are definitely in our Top 30%. So, go find them.
You might just contact them on TikTok.
Maggie The Great
I am a big fan of Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of the UK. She is about the only woman leader that I can think of, over the past 50 years, that stands in the pantheon of greats. She thus proves two things: first, that this is possible; and second, that it is very, very rare.
Thomas Sowell serves a similar role among US black intellectuals. Nearly all educated blacks end up as race hustlers and DEI enthusiasts. Few show much merit beyond this self-serving circle. Much the same is true of women in leadership positions, in government, business or elsewhere. Most are Feminism hustlers and DEI enthusiasts, and do more harm than good. We would be better off without them. A mediocre man is far more tolerable, and useful, than a highly capable woman who is a Feminist hustler and DEI promoter.
But even Margaret Thatcher, the greatest of the great, couldn’t “have it all.” At least she had very high regard for stay-at-home mothers. “To be a mother and housewife is a vocation of a very high kind,” she said.
Like her predecessor, the great Queen Victoria, who presided over fifty years of the pinnacle of British excellence, Margaret Thatcher was an anti-Feminist. Here’s a summary from Grok:
I bring this up as an assurance that we don’t need women to have careers in general. Little good comes of it. Yes, there are a one-in-a-million Margaret Thatchers out there. But, you know what would happen — such women would just do what they do anyway, just as Margaret Thatcher did. So, we would lose nothing, really.
Percent Ever Married: Update
It looks like the 1990s babies will make it to 60%. The 2000s babies, oldest now 25, are on track for maybe 50%. I think this might have a big turnaround sometime, a new “baby boom” in about 10 years, but it will get worse before it gets better.
Just Marry Mr. Darcy
Today, a whole legion of women figured out that they should just marry a rich guy. That is their Big Plan. But, most guys reach their peak earnings or wealth in their 50s — even as an inheritance. No, we want someone who is wealthy in their 30s. And, not fat, or with a pale pasty complexion from working indoors all day, or under six feet tall. We already know this is pretty rare:
$300,000/year is not “wealthy.” It is upper-middle class. You aren’t going to have a yacht or vacation home on $300,000 a year, or at least shouldn’t. You might drive a Lexus, but even that might be a stretch with two cars. A lot of people at $300,000/yr live mostly hand-to-mouth. Using the 3x Income standard for houses, it means you could afford a $900,000 house, if you don’t lose your job. Not two $900,000 houses. If you don’t live hand-to-mouth, and max out your 401(k) at 20%, and then set aside another 10% of income to savings of various sorts, and pay taxes, there isn’t really so much left over.
Nevertheless, after all this, and “settling” for someone merely upper-middle-class, a woman still has a 0.039% chance of getting the guy, right?
Nope. Because, such a man, if he marries at all, is likely to marry a woman like himself.
Here is a group portrait of an investment team at KKR Private Equity:
Now subtract the women, the men over 40, and the married men. You’ve got maybe five men, all of them under 6 feet tall, and most of them with the typical “academic geek in front of a computer all day” physiognomy. I see one guy that women wouldn’t swipe left on within two seconds (second from far right). Also, since these men can presumably marry who they like, we have to assume that the men who want to get married are already married, leaving only those who would rather not.
I think we all know by now that these “marry a rich guy” women are just cosplaying, while getting plowed by players and fuckboys.
Cornerstone 